Armenia vs Serbia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 7.1% against 6.7% in Serbia, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 113th of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.5% | 12.3% | 2.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7.8% | 11.6% | 3.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Armenia or Serbia?
- Armenia, at 7.1% against 6.7% in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Armenia and Serbia?
- 0.4%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Armenia ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 113th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.