Argentina vs Cape Verde: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Argentina
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 32.1% against 31.7% in Argentina, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Argentina ranks 49th and Cape Verde ranks 46th of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.6% | 36.4% | 1.8% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 35.1% | 33.7% | 1.3% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Argentina or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 32.1% against 31.7% in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 0.4%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cape Verde?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Cape Verde rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Argentina ranks 49th and Cape Verde ranks 46th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.