Southern Africa (UNSDG) vs Suriname: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Southern Africa (UNSDG)
16.33
in 2020
Suriname
16.46
in 2020
Southern Africa (UNSDG) rank
23rd
Suriname rank
22nd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Southern Africa (UNSDG)
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 16.46 against 16.33 in Southern Africa (UNSDG), a difference of 0.13.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Southern Africa (UNSDG) ahead.
Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 23rd and Suriname ranks 22nd of 156 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Southern Africa (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa (UNSDG) | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.76 | 14.75 | 2.01 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 16.37 | 15.93 | 0.4453 | Southern Africa (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 16.33 | 16.46 | 0.1372 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Southern Africa (UNSDG) or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 16.46 against 16.33 in Southern Africa (UNSDG) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Suriname?
- 0.13, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Southern Africa (UNSDG) and Suriname rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Southern Africa (UNSDG) ranks 23rd and Suriname ranks 22nd of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.