(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS vs Singapore: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS
13.74
in 2020
Singapore
10.95
in 2020
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS rank
71st
Singapore rank
71st
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS
- Singapore
How they compare
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS currently reports 13.74 against 10.95 in Singapore, a difference of 2.79.
That makes (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS has been ahead every year.
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ranks 71st and Singapore ranks 71st of 156 groups.
(SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.43 | 10.54 | 4.89 | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS |
| 2010s | 14.25 | 10.72 | 3.52 | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS |
| 2020s | 13.74 | 10.95 | 2.79 | (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS or Singapore?
- (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS, at 13.74 against 10.95 in Singapore as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS and Singapore?
- 2.79, with (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS and Singapore?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS and Singapore rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- (SDGRC) ECA_ECOWAS ranks 71st and Singapore ranks 71st of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.