Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs East Timor: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
17.94
in 2020
East Timor
18.21
in 2020
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
16th
East Timor rank
14th

Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
  • East Timor
05101520200020102020

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 18.21 against 17.94 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), a difference of 0.27.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 16th and East Timor ranks 14th of 156 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 16.79 18.11 1.31 East Timor
2010s 17.62 17.5 0.1221 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2020s 17.94 18.21 0.2734 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or East Timor?
East Timor, at 18.21 against 17.94 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) as of 2020.
What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and East Timor?
0.27, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and East Timor?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and East Timor rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 16th and East Timor ranks 14th of 156 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs East Timor: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birth-weight-among-new-borns/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birth-weight-among-new-borns/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/timor-leste/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs East Timor: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
313 places, 6,573 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed