New Zealand vs Serbia: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
New Zealand
5.86
in 2020
Serbia
6.2
in 2020
New Zealand rank
136th
Serbia rank
133rd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 6.2 against 5.86 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.34.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 136th and Serbia ranks 133rd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.1 | 5.93 | 0.1765 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 5.97 | 6.1 | 0.1334 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 5.86 | 6.2 | 0.3451 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, New Zealand or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 6.2 against 5.86 in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 0.34, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- New Zealand ranks 136th and Serbia ranks 133rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.