Melanesia (UNSDG) vs East Timor: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Melanesia (UNSDG)
18.11
in 2020
East Timor
18.21
in 2020
Melanesia (UNSDG) rank
15th
East Timor rank
14th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Melanesia (UNSDG)
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 18.21 against 18.11 in Melanesia (UNSDG), a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.
Melanesia (UNSDG) ranks 15th and East Timor ranks 14th of 156 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Melanesia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia (UNSDG) | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.97 | 18.11 | 1.13 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 17.79 | 17.5 | 0.2955 | Melanesia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 18.11 | 18.21 | 0.1059 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Melanesia (UNSDG) or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 18.21 against 18.11 in Melanesia (UNSDG) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Melanesia (UNSDG) and East Timor?
- 0.1, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia (UNSDG) and East Timor?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Melanesia (UNSDG) and East Timor rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Melanesia (UNSDG) ranks 15th and East Timor ranks 14th of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.