Israel vs Kiribati: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Israel
8.98
in 2020
Kiribati
9.03
in 2020
Israel rank
93rd
Kiribati rank
92nd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Israel
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 9.03 against 8.98 in Israel, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 93rd and Kiribati ranks 92nd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.76 | 9.33 | 0.4393 | Israel |
| 2010s | 9.26 | 9.17 | 0.0909 | Israel |
| 2020s | 8.98 | 9.03 | 0.0475 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Israel or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 9.03 against 8.98 in Israel as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Israel and Kiribati?
- 0.05, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Kiribati?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Israel and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Israel ranks 93rd and Kiribati ranks 92nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.