Hungary vs Oceania (UNSDG): Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Hungary
8.32
in 2020
Oceania (UNSDG)
11.93
in 2020
Hungary rank
99th
Oceania (UNSDG) rank
100th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Hungary
- Oceania (UNSDG)
How they compare
Oceania (UNSDG) currently reports 11.93 against 8.32 in Hungary, a difference of 3.61.
That makes Oceania (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.4 times Hungary's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Oceania (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 99th and Oceania (UNSDG) ranks 100th of 157 countries.
Oceania (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Oceania (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.44 | 11.06 | 2.62 | Oceania (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 8.41 | 11.54 | 3.13 | Oceania (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 8.32 | 11.93 | 3.61 | Oceania (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Hungary or Oceania (UNSDG)?
- Oceania (UNSDG), at 11.93 against 8.32 in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Hungary and Oceania (UNSDG)?
- 3.61, with Oceania (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Oceania (UNSDG)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and Oceania (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Hungary ranks 99th and Oceania (UNSDG) ranks 100th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.