ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) vs Papua New Guinea: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns

ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)
24
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
19.38
in 2020
ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) rank
7th
Papua New Guinea rank
8th

Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time

  • ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)
  • Papua New Guinea
0102030200020102020

How they compare

ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) currently reports 24 against 19.38 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 4.62.

That makes ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)'s figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) ranks 7th and Papua New Guinea ranks 8th of 156 groups.

ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 27.53 18.38 9.15 ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)
2010s 25.11 19.14 5.96 ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)
2020s 24 19.38 4.62 ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) or Papua New Guinea?
ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA), at 24 against 19.38 in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) and Papua New Guinea?
4.62, with ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) and Papua New Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) ranks 7th and Papua New Guinea ranks 8th of 156 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) vs Papua New Guinea: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birth-weight-among-new-borns/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birth-weight-among-new-borns/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa/papua-new-guinea/">ESCAP_South and South-West Asia (SSWA) vs Papua New Guinea: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
313 places, 6,573 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed