ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) vs Guinea-Bissau: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E)
20
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
19.55
in 2020
ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) rank
10th
Guinea-Bissau rank
7th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E)
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) currently reports 20 against 19.55 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) ranks 10th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 7th of 156 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.57 | 23.49 | 1.92 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 20.51 | 21.09 | 0.586 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 20 | 19.55 | 0.4509 | ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) or Guinea-Bissau?
- ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E), at 20 against 19.55 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.45, with ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) and Guinea-Bissau?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- ESCAP_LDC (LDC_E) ranks 10th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 7th of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.