ECE_Euro area (EMU) vs Poland: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
ECE_Euro area (EMU)
7.33
in 2020
Poland
5.61
in 2020
ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank
141st
Poland rank
141st
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- ECE_Euro area (EMU)
- Poland
How they compare
ECE_Euro area (EMU) currently reports 7.33 against 5.61 in Poland, a difference of 1.72.
That makes ECE_Euro area (EMU)'s figure about 1.3 times Poland's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, ECE_Euro area (EMU) has been ahead every year.
ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 141st and Poland ranks 141st of 156 groups.
ECE_Euro area (EMU) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE_Euro area (EMU) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.3 | 5.91 | 1.39 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
| 2010s | 7.41 | 5.74 | 1.67 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
| 2020s | 7.33 | 5.61 | 1.72 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, ECE_Euro area (EMU) or Poland?
- ECE_Euro area (EMU), at 7.33 against 5.61 in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Poland?
- 1.72, with ECE_Euro area (EMU) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Poland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do ECE_Euro area (EMU) and Poland rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 141st and Poland ranks 141st of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.