ECE_CIS (CWG) vs Latvia: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
ECE_CIS (CWG)
6.63
in 2020
Latvia
4.23
in 2020
ECE_CIS (CWG) rank
150th
Latvia rank
153rd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- ECE_CIS (CWG)
- Latvia
How they compare
ECE_CIS (CWG) currently reports 6.63 against 4.23 in Latvia, a difference of 2.4.
That makes ECE_CIS (CWG)'s figure about 1.6 times Latvia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, ECE_CIS (CWG) has been ahead every year.
ECE_CIS (CWG) ranks 150th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 156 groups.
ECE_CIS (CWG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE_CIS (CWG) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.98 | 4.87 | 2.1 | ECE_CIS (CWG) |
| 2010s | 6.82 | 4.45 | 2.37 | ECE_CIS (CWG) |
| 2020s | 6.63 | 4.23 | 2.4 | ECE_CIS (CWG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, ECE_CIS (CWG) or Latvia?
- ECE_CIS (CWG), at 6.63 against 4.23 in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between ECE_CIS (CWG) and Latvia?
- 2.4, with ECE_CIS (CWG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE_CIS (CWG) and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do ECE_CIS (CWG) and Latvia rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- ECE_CIS (CWG) ranks 150th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.