China vs Europe (UNSDG): Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
China
4.97
in 2020
Europe (UNSDG)
7.01
in 2020
China rank
146th
Europe (UNSDG) rank
144th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- China
- Europe (UNSDG)
How they compare
Europe (UNSDG) currently reports 7.01 against 4.97 in China, a difference of 2.04.
That makes Europe (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.4 times China's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Europe (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
China ranks 146th and Europe (UNSDG) ranks 144th of 157 countries.
Europe (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Europe (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.49 | 7.13 | 1.64 | Europe (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 5.06 | 7.08 | 2.02 | Europe (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 4.97 | 7.01 | 2.03 | Europe (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, China or Europe (UNSDG)?
- Europe (UNSDG), at 7.01 against 4.97 in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between China and Europe (UNSDG)?
- 2.04, with Europe (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Europe (UNSDG)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do China and Europe (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- China ranks 146th and Europe (UNSDG) ranks 144th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.