China vs Eastern Europe (UNSDG): Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
China
4.97
in 2020
Eastern Europe (UNSDG)
7.06
in 2020
China rank
146th
Eastern Europe (UNSDG) rank
143rd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- China
- Eastern Europe (UNSDG)
How they compare
Eastern Europe (UNSDG) currently reports 7.06 against 4.97 in China, a difference of 2.09.
That makes Eastern Europe (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.4 times China's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Eastern Europe (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
China ranks 146th and Eastern Europe (UNSDG) ranks 143rd of 157 countries.
Eastern Europe (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eastern Europe (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.49 | 7.2 | 1.72 | Eastern Europe (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 5.06 | 7.06 | 2.01 | Eastern Europe (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 4.97 | 7.06 | 2.08 | Eastern Europe (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, China or Eastern Europe (UNSDG)?
- Eastern Europe (UNSDG), at 7.06 against 4.97 in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between China and Eastern Europe (UNSDG)?
- 2.09, with Eastern Europe (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eastern Europe (UNSDG)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do China and Eastern Europe (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- China ranks 146th and Eastern Europe (UNSDG) ranks 143rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.