Chile vs Monaco: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Chile
6.84
in 2020
Monaco
6.82
in 2020
Chile rank
120th
Monaco rank
122nd
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Chile
- Monaco
How they compare
Chile currently reports 6.84 against 6.82 in Monaco, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Monaco ahead.
Chile ranks 120th and Monaco ranks 122nd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.59 | 7.28 | 1.69 | Monaco |
| 2010s | 6.35 | 6.95 | 0.5975 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 6.84 | 6.82 | 0.0121 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Chile or Monaco?
- Chile, at 6.84 against 6.82 in Monaco as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Chile and Monaco?
- 0.02, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Monaco?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Monaco rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Chile ranks 120th and Monaco ranks 122nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.