Central Asia (UNSDG) vs Finland: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Central Asia (UNSDG)
5.99
in 2020
Finland
4.07
in 2020
Central Asia (UNSDG) rank
153rd
Finland rank
156th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Central Asia (UNSDG)
- Finland
How they compare
Central Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 5.99 against 4.07 in Finland, a difference of 1.92.
That makes Central Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.5 times Finland's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Central Asia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 153rd and Finland ranks 156th of 156 groups.
Central Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia (UNSDG) | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.52 | 4.22 | 2.3 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 6.25 | 4.12 | 2.12 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 5.99 | 4.07 | 1.92 | Central Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Central Asia (UNSDG) or Finland?
- Central Asia (UNSDG), at 5.99 against 4.07 in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Central Asia (UNSDG) and Finland?
- 1.92, with Central Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia (UNSDG) and Finland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Central Asia (UNSDG) and Finland rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Central Asia (UNSDG) ranks 153rd and Finland ranks 156th of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.