Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.15
in 2020
China
4.97
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
143rd
China rank
146th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- China
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 5.15 against 4.97 in China, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and China ranks 146th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1 | 5.49 | 0.3869 | China |
| 2010s | 5.16 | 5.06 | 0.1008 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 5.15 | 4.97 | 0.1812 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Bosnia and Herzegovina or China?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 5.15 against 4.97 in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 0.18, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and China ranks 146th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.