Belarus vs ECE_Euro area (EMU): Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Belarus
5.12
in 2020
ECE_Euro area (EMU)
7.33
in 2020
Belarus rank
144th
ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank
141st
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Belarus
- ECE_Euro area (EMU)
How they compare
ECE_Euro area (EMU) currently reports 7.33 against 5.12 in Belarus, a difference of 2.21.
That makes ECE_Euro area (EMU)'s figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, ECE_Euro area (EMU) has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 144th and ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 141st of 157 countries.
ECE_Euro area (EMU) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | ECE_Euro area (EMU) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.16 | 7.3 | 2.14 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
| 2010s | 5.07 | 7.41 | 2.34 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
| 2020s | 5.12 | 7.33 | 2.21 | ECE_Euro area (EMU) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Belarus or ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- ECE_Euro area (EMU), at 7.33 against 5.12 in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Belarus and ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- 2.21, with ECE_Euro area (EMU) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Belarus ranks 144th and ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 141st of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.