Australia vs Republic of Moldova: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Australia
6.55
in 2020
Republic of Moldova
6.47
in 2020
Australia rank
126th
Republic of Moldova rank
127th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Australia
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Australia currently reports 6.55 against 6.47 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Australia ranks 126th and Republic of Moldova ranks 127th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.29 | 6.54 | 0.2559 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 6.45 | 6.5 | 0.0468 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 6.55 | 6.47 | 0.0832 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Australia or Republic of Moldova?
- Australia, at 6.55 against 6.47 in Republic of Moldova as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Australia and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.08, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Republic of Moldova?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Australia ranks 126th and Republic of Moldova ranks 127th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.