Asia (UNSDG) vs Mozambique: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Asia (UNSDG)
17.29
in 2020
Mozambique
17.76
in 2020
Asia (UNSDG) rank
19th
Mozambique rank
16th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Asia (UNSDG)
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 17.76 against 17.29 in Asia (UNSDG), a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
Asia (UNSDG) ranks 19th and Mozambique ranks 16th of 156 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Asia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia (UNSDG) | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.01 | 18.99 | 0.018 | Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 17.15 | 17.99 | 0.8427 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 17.29 | 17.76 | 0.4737 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Asia (UNSDG) or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 17.76 against 17.29 in Asia (UNSDG) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Asia (UNSDG) and Mozambique?
- 0.47, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia (UNSDG) and Mozambique?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Asia (UNSDG) and Mozambique rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Asia (UNSDG) ranks 19th and Mozambique ranks 16th of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.