Asia (UNSDG) vs Botswana: Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns
Asia (UNSDG)
17.29
in 2020
Botswana
16.83
in 2020
Asia (UNSDG) rank
19th
Botswana rank
19th
Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns over time
- Asia (UNSDG)
- Botswana
How they compare
Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 17.29 against 16.83 in Botswana, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
Asia (UNSDG) ranks 19th and Botswana ranks 19th of 156 groups.
Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia (UNSDG) | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.01 | 18.07 | 0.9381 | Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 17.15 | 17.14 | 0.012 | Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 17.29 | 16.83 | 0.4521 | Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns, Asia (UNSDG) or Botswana?
- Asia (UNSDG), at 17.29 against 16.83 in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns between Asia (UNSDG) and Botswana?
- 0.46, with Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia (UNSDG) and Botswana?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Asia (UNSDG) and Botswana rank globally for prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns?
- Asia (UNSDG) ranks 19th and Botswana ranks 19th of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of low birth weight among new-borns. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.