Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Prevalence of hypertension
Sri Lanka
35.6%
in 2019
East Timor
35.3%
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
118th
East Timor rank
119th
Prevalence of hypertension over time
- Sri Lanka
- East Timor
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 35.6% against 35.3% in East Timor, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.8% | 30.0% | 1.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 32.4% | 32.5% | 0.1% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 34.5% | 0.0% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of hypertension, Sri Lanka or East Timor?
- Sri Lanka, at 35.6% against 35.3% in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of hypertension between Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 0.3%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and East Timor rank globally for prevalence of hypertension?
- Sri Lanka ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 119th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization's Global Health Observatory Data Repository, published as Prevalence of hypertension (% of adults ages 30-79). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of hypertension is the percentage of adults ages 30-79 with hypertension (defined as having systolic blood pressure =140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure =90 mmHg, or taking medication for hypertension). The data is age-standardized.