Botswana vs Kiribati: Prevalence of hypertension, male
Botswana
40.3%
in 2019
Kiribati
40.4%
in 2019
Botswana rank
66th
Kiribati rank
64th
Prevalence of hypertension, male over time
- Botswana
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 40.4% against 40.3% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 66th and Kiribati ranks 64th of 192 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.9% | 32.5% | 4.4% | Botswana |
| 2000s | 39.4% | 33.2% | 6.2% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 40.6% | 38.1% | 2.5% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of hypertension, male, Botswana or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 40.4% against 40.3% in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of hypertension, male between Botswana and Kiribati?
- 0.1%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kiribati?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of hypertension, male?
- Botswana ranks 66th and Kiribati ranks 64th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization's Global Health Observatory Data Repository, published as Prevalence of hypertension, male (% of male adults ages 30-79). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of hypertension, male, is the percentage of male adults ages 30-79 with hypertension (defined as having systolic blood pressure =140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure =90 mmHg, or taking medication for hypertension). The data is age-standardized.