Libya vs East Timor: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age
Libya
29.3%
in 2023
East Timor
29.7%
in 2023
Libya rank
74th
East Timor rank
72nd
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age over time
- Libya
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 29.7% against 29.3% in Libya, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.
Libya ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.0% | 30.8% | 0.9% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 28.0% | 0.2% | Libya |
| 2020s | 28.8% | 28.9% | 0.1% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age, Libya or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 29.7% against 29.3% in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age between Libya and East Timor?
- 0.4%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Libya and East Timor rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age?
- Libya ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Observatory Data Repository/World Health Statistics, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age refers to the combined prevalence of both non-pregnant with haemoglobin levels below 12 g/dL and pregnant women with haemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL.