Laos vs Libya: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age
Laos
28.6%
in 2023
Libya
29.3%
in 2023
Laos rank
77th
Libya rank
74th
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age over time
- Laos
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 29.3% against 28.6% in Laos, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 77th and Libya ranks 74th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.9% | 30.0% | 4.0% | Laos |
| 2010s | 29.9% | 28.2% | 1.7% | Laos |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 28.8% | 0.4% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age, Laos or Libya?
- Libya, at 29.3% against 28.6% in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age between Laos and Libya?
- 0.7%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Libya rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age?
- Laos ranks 77th and Libya ranks 74th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Observatory Data Repository/World Health Statistics, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age refers to the combined prevalence of both non-pregnant with haemoglobin levels below 12 g/dL and pregnant women with haemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL.