Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women
Kiribati
26.8%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
27.3%
in 2023
Kiribati rank
85th
Zimbabwe rank
84th
Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women over time
- Kiribati
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 27.3% against 26.8% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Kiribati ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 192 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.5% | 29.9% | 5.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 24.4% | 24.9% | 0.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 25.9% | 26.2% | 0.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 27.3% against 26.8% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 0.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women?
- Kiribati ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Observatory Data Repository/World Health Statistics, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women (% of women ages 15-49). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of anemia, non-pregnant women, is the percentage of non-pregnant women whose hemoglobin level is less than 120 grams per liter at sea level.