Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Rwanda
37.9%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
37.8%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 37.9% against 37.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 47.3% | 3.9% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 38.2% | 43.0% | 4.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Rwanda, at 37.9% against 37.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Rwanda ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.