Nicaragua vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Nicaragua
20.9%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
20.4%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
130th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
131st
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Nicaragua
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 20.9% against 20.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 130th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 131st of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.8% | 24.4% | 2.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 18.7% | 21.5% | 2.8% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Nicaragua or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Nicaragua, at 20.9% against 20.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.5%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Nicaragua ranks 130th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 131st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.