Lower-middle income (World Bank) vs Mali: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Lower-middle income (World Bank)
50.0%
in 2019
Mali
79.0%
in 2019
Lower-middle income (World Bank) rank
4th
Mali rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Lower-middle income (World Bank)
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 79.0% against 50.0% in Lower-middle income (World Bank), a difference of 29.0%.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.6 times Lower-middle income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Mali ranks 2nd of 17 groups.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower-middle income (World Bank) | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2% | 83.1% | 23.9% | Mali |
| 2010s | 52.0% | 81.0% | 29.0% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Lower-middle income (World Bank) or Mali?
- Mali, at 79.0% against 50.0% in Lower-middle income (World Bank) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Lower-middle income (World Bank) and Mali?
- 29.0%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower-middle income (World Bank) and Mali?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Lower-middle income (World Bank) and Mali rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Mali ranks 2nd of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.