Laos vs Nauru: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Laos
41.4%
in 2019
Nauru
41.8%
in 2019
Laos rank
61st
Nauru rank
60th
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Laos
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 41.8% against 41.4% in Laos, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 61st and Nauru ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.6% | 46.1% | 0.6% | Laos |
| 2010s | 41.8% | 44.6% | 2.9% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Laos or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 41.8% against 41.4% in Laos as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Laos and Nauru?
- 0.4%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Nauru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Laos and Nauru rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Laos ranks 61st and Nauru ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.