Central African Republic vs Sur: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Central African Republic
73.6%
in 2019
Sur
25.9%
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
5th
Sur rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Central African Republic
- Sur
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 73.6% against 25.9% in Sur, a difference of 47.7%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 2.8 times Sur's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.0% | 31.8% | 48.2% | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 76.1% | 27.1% | 49.0% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Central African Republic or Sur?
- Central African Republic, at 73.6% against 25.9% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Central African Republic and Sur?
- 47.7%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sur?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Sur rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Central African Republic ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.