Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months
Bolivia
36.9%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
37.8%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months over time
- Bolivia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 37.8% against 36.9% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.1% | 47.3% | 8.8% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 44.9% | 43.0% | 1.9% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months, Bolivia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 37.8% against 36.9% in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months between Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months?
- Bolivia ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.