East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Monaco: Population, male, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
67.6 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Monaco
9,150 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
5th
Monaco rank
2nd

Population, male, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Monaco
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 9,150 units per square kilometre against 67.6 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 9,082 units per square kilometre.

That makes Monaco's figure about 135.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Monaco ranks 2nd of 44 groups.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Monaco Difference Ahead
1960s 31.27 units per square kilometre 5,103 units per square kilometre 5,072 units per square kilometre Monaco
1970s 39.22 units per square kilometre 5,786 units per square kilometre 5,747 units per square kilometre Monaco
1980s 46.45 units per square kilometre 6,631 units per square kilometre 6,584 units per square kilometre Monaco
1990s 54.22 units per square kilometre 7,459 units per square kilometre 7,405 units per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 60.02 units per square kilometre 7,730 units per square kilometre 7,670 units per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 64.95 units per square kilometre 8,724 units per square kilometre 8,659 units per square kilometre Monaco
2020s 67.45 units per square kilometre 9,137 units per square kilometre 9,069 units per square kilometre Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, male, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Monaco?
Monaco, at 9,150 units per square kilometre against 67.6 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, male, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Monaco?
9,082 units per square kilometre, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Monaco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Monaco rank globally for population, male, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Monaco ranks 2nd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Monaco: Population, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-male-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-male-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/monaco/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Monaco: Population, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.