East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Equatorial Guinea: Population, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.5055 units per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0.5269 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
11th
Equatorial Guinea rank
13th

Population, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.6196019922025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.5269 units per person against 0.5055 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0214 units per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5068 units per person 0.487 units per person 0.0198 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.5061 units per person 0.4849 units per person 0.0212 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.5058 units per person 0.4857 units per person 0.0201 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.5067 units per person 0.4936 units per person 0.0131 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 0.5073 units per person 0.5115 units per person 0.0042 units per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.5075 units per person 0.527 units per person 0.0196 units per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.5062 units per person 0.528 units per person 0.0218 units per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.5269 units per person against 0.5055 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0214 units per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for population, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Equatorial Guinea: Population, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/equatorial-guinea/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Equatorial Guinea: Population, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 17,394 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.