East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Population, female, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
31st
Pakistan rank
34th

Population, female, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Pakistan
00.0020.0040.006196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 6.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Pakistan ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 34th of 44 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0056 units per US$ of GDP 0.0043 units per US$ of GDP 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.0029 units per US$ of GDP 0.0029 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2000s 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2010s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, female, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population, female, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan?
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan rank globally for population, female, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 34th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Population, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/pakistan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Population, female, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, female, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 14,741 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.