Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Population, female, per square kilometre

Pakistan
157.97 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States Virgin Islands
156.5 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
38th
United States Virgin Islands rank
39th

Population, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • United States Virgin Islands
50100150196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 157.97 units per square kilometre against 156.5 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 1.47 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States Virgin Islands ahead.

Pakistan ranks 38th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 39th of 215 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 31.5 units per square kilometre 64.89 units per square kilometre 33.39 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1970s 41.97 units per square kilometre 125.69 units per square kilometre 83.72 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1980s 60.15 units per square kilometre 148.96 units per square kilometre 88.81 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1990s 83.25 units per square kilometre 158.72 units per square kilometre 75.46 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2000s 109.44 units per square kilometre 161.85 units per square kilometre 52.41 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2010s 136.43 units per square kilometre 159.86 units per square kilometre 23.43 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2020s 153.66 units per square kilometre 156.6 units per square kilometre 2.94 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, female, per square kilometre, Pakistan or United States Virgin Islands?
Pakistan, at 157.97 units per square kilometre against 156.5 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, female, per square kilometre between Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands?
1.47 units per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for population, female, per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 38th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 39th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/virgin-islands-u-s/">Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Population, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.