IBRD only vs Rwanda: Population, female, per square kilometre

IBRD only
34.65 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
289.91 units per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
16th
Rwanda rank
19th

Population, female, per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Rwanda
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 289.91 units per square kilometre against 34.65 units per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 255.26 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.4 times IBRD only's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 44 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 20.85 units per square kilometre 70.44 units per square kilometre 49.59 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 25.68 units per square kilometre 92.68 units per square kilometre 67 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 31.02 units per square kilometre 126.64 units per square kilometre 95.63 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 27.94 units per square kilometre 153.04 units per square kilometre 125.1 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 29.3 units per square kilometre 190.44 units per square kilometre 161.14 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 32.47 units per square kilometre 240.66 units per square kilometre 208.19 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 34.38 units per square kilometre 280.88 units per square kilometre 246.5 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, female, per square kilometre, IBRD only or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 289.91 units per square kilometre against 34.65 units per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, female, per square kilometre between IBRD only and Rwanda?
255.26 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Rwanda rank globally for population, female, per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Rwanda: Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/rwanda/">IBRD only vs Rwanda: Population, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.