IBRD only vs Naoero: Population, female, per square kilometre

IBRD only
34.65 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
291.35 units per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
16th
Naoero rank
17th

Population, female, per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Naoero
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 291.35 units per square kilometre against 34.65 units per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 256.7 units per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 8.4 times IBRD only's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 16th and Naoero ranks 17th of 44 groups.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Naoero Difference Ahead
1960s 20.85 units per square kilometre 108.17 units per square kilometre 87.32 units per square kilometre Naoero
1970s 25.68 units per square kilometre 133.88 units per square kilometre 108.2 units per square kilometre Naoero
1980s 31.02 units per square kilometre 202.44 units per square kilometre 171.42 units per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 27.94 units per square kilometre 243.54 units per square kilometre 215.6 units per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 29.3 units per square kilometre 244.19 units per square kilometre 214.89 units per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 32.47 units per square kilometre 264.22 units per square kilometre 231.75 units per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 34.38 units per square kilometre 288.32 units per square kilometre 253.94 units per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, female, per square kilometre, IBRD only or Naoero?
Naoero, at 291.35 units per square kilometre against 34.65 units per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, female, per square kilometre between IBRD only and Naoero?
256.7 units per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Naoero?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Naoero rank globally for population, female, per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 16th and Naoero ranks 17th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Naoero: Population, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/naoero/">IBRD only vs Naoero: Population, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.