Latvia vs Low income: Population ages 80 and above, male
Latvia
3.4%
in 2025
Low income
0.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
42nd
Low income rank
41st
Population ages 80 and above, male over time
- Latvia
- Low income
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.4% against 0.3% in Low income, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 10.0 times Low income's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 41st of 218 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.3% | 0.2% | 1.0% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 1.2% | 0.2% | 1.0% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 1.4% | 0.3% | 1.1% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 1.5% | 0.3% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.5% | 0.3% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 0.3% | 2.3% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 0.3% | 3.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 80 and above, male, Latvia or Low income?
- Latvia, at 3.4% against 0.3% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, male between Latvia and Low income?
- 3.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Low income?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Low income rank globally for population ages 80 and above, male?
- Latvia ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 41st of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Population ages 80 and above, male (% of male population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Male population between the ages 80 and above as a percentage of the total male population.