Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre
Guam
2.68 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0841 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
37th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
37th
Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre over time
- Guam
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Guam currently reports 2.68 units per square kilometre against 0.0841 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 2.6 units per square kilometre.
That makes Guam's figure about 31.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 215 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1171 units per square kilometre | 0.0168 units per square kilometre | 0.1003 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1970s | 0.1507 units per square kilometre | 0.0209 units per square kilometre | 0.1299 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1980s | 0.2887 units per square kilometre | 0.0298 units per square kilometre | 0.2589 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1990s | 0.5891 units per square kilometre | 0.0399 units per square kilometre | 0.5492 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2000s | 1.16 units per square kilometre | 0.0547 units per square kilometre | 1.1 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2010s | 1.88 units per square kilometre | 0.069 units per square kilometre | 1.81 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2020s | 2.52 units per square kilometre | 0.0811 units per square kilometre | 2.44 units per square kilometre | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre, Guam or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Guam, at 2.68 units per square kilometre against 0.0841 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre between Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 2.6 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre?
- Guam ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 80 and above, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.