Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.1023 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.1173 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
169th
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th

Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.1173 units per square kilometre against 0.1023 units per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.015 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bhutan ranks 169th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0057 units per square kilometre 0.0263 units per square kilometre 0.0206 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0081 units per square kilometre 0.0228 units per square kilometre 0.0146 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.012 units per square kilometre 0.0265 units per square kilometre 0.0145 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0176 units per square kilometre 0.036 units per square kilometre 0.0184 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.052 units per square kilometre 0.0544 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0966 units per square kilometre 0.0942 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.1036 units per square kilometre 0.1139 units per square kilometre 0.0103 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.1173 units per square kilometre against 0.1023 units per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
0.015 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 169th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.