Tunisia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre

Tunisia
0.6664 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.6695 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
113th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Tunisia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.6695 units per square kilometre against 0.6664 units per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0031 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0745 units per square kilometre 0.0382 units per square kilometre 0.0362 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.088 units per square kilometre 0.0341 units per square kilometre 0.0539 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.1106 units per square kilometre 0.0473 units per square kilometre 0.0633 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.1763 units per square kilometre 0.0558 units per square kilometre 0.1205 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.3022 units per square kilometre 0.1541 units per square kilometre 0.1481 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.5267 units per square kilometre 0.4782 units per square kilometre 0.0484 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.6518 units per square kilometre 0.6624 units per square kilometre 0.0106 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Tunisia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.6695 units per square kilometre against 0.6664 units per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Tunisia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0031 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Tunisia ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Tunisia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.