Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tuvalu: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre

Saint Kitts and Nevis
1.99 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
2.1 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
71st
Tuvalu rank
69th

Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tuvalu
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 2.1 units per square kilometre against 1.99 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.11 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 71st and Tuvalu ranks 69th of 215 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 units per square kilometre 0.5778 units per square kilometre 0.5543 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 1.18 units per square kilometre 0.5933 units per square kilometre 0.5858 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 1.84 units per square kilometre 0.9733 units per square kilometre 0.8709 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 2.06 units per square kilometre 1.22 units per square kilometre 0.8395 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 2.26 units per square kilometre 1.84 units per square kilometre 0.4121 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.31 units per square kilometre 1.97 units per square kilometre 0.3378 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 2.11 units per square kilometre 2.05 units per square kilometre 0.0644 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 2.1 units per square kilometre against 1.99 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu?
0.11 units per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tuvalu rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 71st and Tuvalu ranks 69th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tuvalu: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tuvalu/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tuvalu: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.