Least developed countries vs Portugal: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
0.1698 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
5.04 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
33rd
Portugal rank
34th

Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Portugal
0246196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 5.04 units per square kilometre against 0.1698 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 4.87 units per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 29.7 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 34th of 43 groups.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0255 units per square kilometre 0.8418 units per square kilometre 0.8163 units per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0334 units per square kilometre 0.9886 units per square kilometre 0.9551 units per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0489 units per square kilometre 1.49 units per square kilometre 1.44 units per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0645 units per square kilometre 2.19 units per square kilometre 2.12 units per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0914 units per square kilometre 2.94 units per square kilometre 2.84 units per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.1243 units per square kilometre 4.22 units per square kilometre 4.1 units per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 0.16 units per square kilometre 4.89 units per square kilometre 4.73 units per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Portugal?
Portugal, at 5.04 units per square kilometre against 0.1698 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Portugal?
4.87 units per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Portugal rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 34th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Portugal: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/portugal/">Least developed countries vs Portugal: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.