Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.6756 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.6695 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
108th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.6756 units per square kilometre against 0.6695 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0061 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 108th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0411 units per square kilometre 0.0382 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.069 units per square kilometre 0.0341 units per square kilometre 0.0349 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.152 units per square kilometre 0.0473 units per square kilometre 0.1047 units per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.2491 units per square kilometre 0.0558 units per square kilometre 0.1933 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.4009 units per square kilometre 0.1541 units per square kilometre 0.2468 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.6217 units per square kilometre 0.4782 units per square kilometre 0.1435 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.657 units per square kilometre 0.6624 units per square kilometre 0.0054 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Guatemala, at 0.6756 units per square kilometre against 0.6695 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0061 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 108th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Guatemala vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.