Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Guam
3.94 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.1326 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
40th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
37th
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time
- Guam
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Guam currently reports 3.94 units per square kilometre against 0.1326 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 3.81 units per square kilometre.
That makes Guam's figure about 29.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 215 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1673 units per square kilometre | 0.0241 units per square kilometre | 0.1432 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1970s | 0.2737 units per square kilometre | 0.0307 units per square kilometre | 0.243 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1980s | 0.5541 units per square kilometre | 0.0436 units per square kilometre | 0.5105 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1990s | 0.9263 units per square kilometre | 0.0579 units per square kilometre | 0.8684 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2000s | 1.53 units per square kilometre | 0.0801 units per square kilometre | 1.45 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2010s | 2.58 units per square kilometre | 0.1054 units per square kilometre | 2.48 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2020s | 3.59 units per square kilometre | 0.1279 units per square kilometre | 3.46 units per square kilometre | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Guam or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Guam, at 3.94 units per square kilometre against 0.1326 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 3.81 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
- Guam ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.