Aruba vs United States Virgin Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre

Aruba
8.9 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States Virgin Islands
8.8 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
19th
United States Virgin Islands rank
20th

Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • United States Virgin Islands
02468196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 8.9 units per square kilometre against 8.8 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.1 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 19th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 20th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and United States Virgin Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6451 units per square kilometre 0.6422 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 0.9583 units per square kilometre 0.962 units per square kilometre 0.0037 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1980s 2.48 units per square kilometre 1.15 units per square kilometre 1.33 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 3.08 units per square kilometre 1.99 units per square kilometre 1.09 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 3.14 units per square kilometre 3.63 units per square kilometre 0.4878 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2010s 5.8 units per square kilometre 5.5 units per square kilometre 0.2998 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 8.52 units per square kilometre 8.2 units per square kilometre 0.3237 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre, Aruba or United States Virgin Islands?
Aruba, at 8.9 units per square kilometre against 8.8 units per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre between Aruba and United States Virgin Islands?
0.1 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and United States Virgin Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 19th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs United States Virgin Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/virgin-islands-u-s/">Aruba vs United States Virgin Islands: Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.