Gibraltar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita

Gibraltar
0.0277 units per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0026 units per person
in 2025
Gibraltar rank
43rd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
41st

Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
00.010.020.03196019922025

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 0.0277 units per person against 0.0026 units per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0251 units per person.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 10.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.

Gibraltar ranks 43rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 41st of 217 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0096 units per person 0.0019 units per person 0.0077 units per person Gibraltar
1970s 0.0108 units per person 0.0019 units per person 0.0089 units per person Gibraltar
1980s 0.0142 units per person 0.002 units per person 0.0122 units per person Gibraltar
1990s 0.0222 units per person 0.0021 units per person 0.0201 units per person Gibraltar
2000s 0.0283 units per person 0.0022 units per person 0.0261 units per person Gibraltar
2010s 0.0288 units per person 0.0024 units per person 0.0264 units per person Gibraltar
2020s 0.0268 units per person 0.0025 units per person 0.0243 units per person Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 80 and above, female, per capita, Gibraltar or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Gibraltar, at 0.0277 units per person against 0.0026 units per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 80 and above, female, per capita between Gibraltar and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.0251 units per person, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Gibraltar and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 80 and above, female, per capita?
Gibraltar ranks 43rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 41st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-capita/gibraltar/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-80-and-above-female-per-capita/gibraltar/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Gibraltar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 80 and above, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.