Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
2.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
2.23 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
47th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
45th

Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 2.23 units per square kilometre against 2.08 units per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.15 units per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Cayman Islands's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 47th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 45th of 215 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1759 units per square kilometre 0.3981 units per square kilometre 0.2222 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.2633 units per square kilometre 0.5493 units per square kilometre 0.286 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.3792 units per square kilometre 0.6875 units per square kilometre 0.3083 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.6121 units per square kilometre 0.8488 units per square kilometre 0.2367 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.7954 units per square kilometre 0.9465 units per square kilometre 0.1511 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 1.21 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.0903 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 1.89 units per square kilometre 2 units per square kilometre 0.1105 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 2.23 units per square kilometre against 2.08 units per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.15 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 47th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 45th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-male-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-male-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.